karl ammann
bushmeat activist, wildlife photographer, author;

why this site karl's CV karl's Career photo credits awards search site
main gallery reptiles elephants tigers great apes african predators signature images asian conservation bushmeat african conservation bili ape project how to order
open letters articles printed reports web reports
ape smuggling bonobo/Lomako China wildlife trade Sudan chimp orphans Egypt cheetahs
Cairo Connection Mong Lah Connection Kinshasa Connection Bangui Connection Gombe Connection Bear Bile Farm Other video/podcasts how to order
All Apes Great & Small Cheetah Consuming Nature Die Grossen Menschenaffen Eating Apes East African Wildlife Elephant Reflections Gorillas Great Ape Odyssey Great Apes & Humans Hunters & Hunted Little Bull Masai Mara Orangutan Odyssey
the early days correspondence project reports scientific articles karl's notes photographs dna evidence bili coffee project 2010 bili update
contact us:
email: photo inquiries
email: karl directly
in USA: 301-854-0388

present features:

As CITES annual conf.
nears Karl expounds on
CITES double standards.

Karl's exposition of the
real Ivory price
in China.

Christopher Hasslet's
incredible report on the
illicit online ape trade.

An open letter regarding
developments in Guinea

concerning the illegal
export of great apes.

karl's recent Report on
, its permitting
system, with clear
evidence of its
failure to police
the trade in live animals
of endangered species

karl discusses how
disappearing wildlife,
worldwild, reappears
in Chinese Zoo and
Safari Park facilities

karl interviewed by
Southeast Asia Globe
reveals his trade secrets;
staying out of trouble,
disillusion w/progress
on illicit animal trade

CITES 2011 Guinea
Mission Report

karl comments on
Apparent drop in
rhino horn demand

karl wins another
SAB environmental
media award

Commercial Exploitation
and Cites

karl ammannn

Overwhelmed U.S. port
inspectors unable to keep up
with illegal wildlife trade
Darryl Fears (in Wash Post)

African fraud, local market
exacerbate illegal primate

Global Times

Media Report (in Chinese)
Southern China Weekly

the Conakry Connection
very detailed report on
great ape smuggling in Guinea
provides insight into the
worldwide animal trade.
karl ammann and others

latest (9-14)Conakry
Connection update

karl ammann and others

latest (1-14)Conakry
Connection update

karl ammann and others

Cites and the Shanghai 8
exporting illegal wild apes
claiming them captive bred
karl ammann

Cites and the Taiping4
more on the export
of illegal wild apes
claimed as captive bred
karl ammann

Karl's blogs for
National Geographic
tiger Trade, china's chimp
smuggling, ivory tracking,
rhino poaching and more.

Tiger farming in
SE Asia

karl ammann

more on the China-
Gorilla story

karl ammann

Cites and the illegal
trade in wildlife

karl ammann

emails/letters/issues ignored
bonobos to Armenia

GRASP correspondence on
illegal animal trade

allegations of a coverup at the
CITES secretariat

karl ammann

a fairy tale of ivory:
the ongoing tragedy of
incompetence, slaughter,
and lawlessness.
karl ammann and others

for details see this
transcript with NBouke.
karl ammann and others

the Rhino & the Bling - the
inside mechanics of the
rhino horn trade.
karl ammann

karl's latest elephant
poaching video

Millions spent on ape
conservation and where
are the results?

karl ammann

an interview with Karl
on the state of conservation,
poaching, trafficking
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3

Where Did All
the Tigers Go?

karl ammann

the detailed report on
The Cairo Connection:
Ape Trafficking

karl ammann

the updated report on
The Cairo Connection:
Ape Trafficking in Egypt

karl ammann

Tiger, Lion bones
and rhino horn

another piece in Swara

karl ammann

Tiger cake & rhino horn
from Swara, a magazine of the
East African Wildlife Society

karl ammann

Into the Asian Underworld
in Africa Geograpic's
Rhino Watch
(page 3)
karl ammann

karl speaks at Foreign
Correspondents' Club of
Thailand - International
Trade in Reptile Skins

rhino versus ape

karl ammann

the rhino horn story
at consumer end
karl ammann

the latest horrors of
Poaching in
karl ammann

addendums to
elephants and elephant
conservation in the DRC

karl ammann

Our reptile skin trade
is now online.

Rhino Files: 333 rhinos
killed by poachers in
barbaric fashion

karl ammann
bernadette cook

Cites and the diplomatic
approach: these videos
say it does not work

karl ammann

Karl wins another
Genesis award

notes on Orang conservation
in Kalimantan - a sad story

errol pietersen

despite illegally held apes
CITES action minimal

karl ammann

asia geographic on
illegal wildlife trade

dale peterson
karl amman

africa geographic
reports on karl's
smuggling studies

karl ammann

Karl's German site

of interest

karl nominated for
zoological society medal

'Canned hunting': the
lions bred for slaughter

The Guardian

Seven rhinos killed ...
Kenya's bloodiest week

The Guardian

Forestry Education info
chase g

Not on Animal Planet
karl ammann

2010 Bili-Uere Update
karl ammann

more on wildlife
trafficking from Boten -
bears, leopard, tiger cubs

karl ammann

"horrific slaughter of
elephants ... butchered
in the Central African
Republic ... "

from BBC Newsnight

HIV ignored in Natl
Geographic article on
disease transmission

karl ammann

The Protein Gap
A misleading article

karl ammann

Mass Gorilla Execution
Can we learn from it?

karl ammann

Hundreds of Elephants
killed in DRC Park

from radio Okapi

Hunting Report take
on Chimp escape

karl ammann

US Wildlife Agency
provides a bandaid

karl ammann

open letter to CITES
re: wildlife export

karl ammann

important books

elephant reflections
dale peterson
karl ammann

eating apes
dale peterson
karl ammann

consuming nature
anthony rose
karl ammann

Unsustainable Logging Practises, Economic Viability of Logging in Africa and Continued Bushmeat Hunting

in response to a posting on the AZA Bushmeat List

Let me start with your concluding proposed solution which has three parts: Setting up the code of conduct, the incentives for logging, and the need for a level playing field.

Question: Was that not the take off point, based on which sustainable logging criteria were discussed and loggers were to be certified some 10 years ago? (An issue which is no longer even mentioned in your endorsement of present conservation/logging cooperation agreements.)

Isn't it a fact that today not a single cubic meter of certified timber (under an internationally recognized system) is coming out of Central Africa?

At what stage will the continuing unsustainable logging practices impact the very wildlife these new projects are supposed to protect?

Hasn't it already been established that logging disturbance in itself, without hunting, has a similar impact on chimp populations and distribution as hunting does in unlogged forests?

However I do see the difference in the two (past and present) proposals for certification:

With FSC, loggers were responsible for implementing a wide range of management criteria and were expected to do so at their own cost and then pay an international surveillance outfit to come and do an independent third party audit. With the proposed wildlife management code of conduct it would be largely left to the government and conservation NGO's to accept responsibility for the implementation and there is no word on who would certify and what this auditing process would include and who would pay for it.

The reason for the above adaption to loggers needs seems to be established in your second paragraph: "Preliminary findings and recommendations":

"Loggers need technical help, they have no experts in wildlife management".

Many of the logging companies in question do operate private aircraft to fly around executives. Did they become aviation experts and pilots? No, it seems they hired pilots! Why shouldn't the logging companies hire wildlife experts to implement these new codes of conduct? Furthermore is bushmeat and poaching control really a wildlife management issue or one of managing people?

Then comes your most crucial paragraph." Loggers need to remain competitive economically. Until laws are harmonized costs of wildlife management should be offset by donors or governments to compensate companies for good behavior and ensure that they remain competitive."

First let's forget governments making funds available for wildlife management in and around logging concession. Lets talk about it when there is such a commitment. Second have the loggers agreed, in any form, that they will start absorbing the costs once a level playing field is established?? There is no such indication in any of the meeting minutes of any of the CEO meetings discussing these cooperation agreements.

Now about this "need for logging to remain competitive":

Were any representative of any Rain Forest Protection organizations, who have some pretty good idea as to the profitability of logging in Central Africa, present at this meeting?

Did anybody bring any balance sheet or operating statements for any of the big logging outfits operations in Central Africa or/and their overseas holding companies. Were salary levels of logging company CEO's being discussed?

Did anybody present the figures from the last World Bank mission report, which evaluated the CIB/WCS cooperation agreement? This to me is a real eye opener:

The wildlife management project cost for a two year period was US$ 640,000 involving what seems to be a small corner of the concession. The JGI proposal for a similar project has a $6 million overall price tag. Where will the money be coming from: "To build on pilot activities and keep momentum going...?"

Were you told how the US$ 640,000 for the CIB/WCS pilot project was made up? That CIB contributed $75,000 in kind, WCS $180,000 in cash end the rest came in form of donor or taxpayer money.

Were the overall figures provided? The gross income, from annual sales of 270,000 m3, is estimated by the bank as being some S50 million, on which the company pays 4.4% in local payroll and 6.6% in tax and O.18% FOR WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT. If a company with such basic operating figures is not highly profitable, then the best way to spend money would be to pay scholarships for loggers to go to business school.

Lets be dramatic here. If an old lady with a $1000 pension were to give $50, so no more chimps and gorillas get slaughtered around Kabo, she would have proportionally contributed more than the logging company did.

Did anybody ask the question of how you will explain to a timber consumer in the west that he should continue to only buy certified timber from Africa or anywhere else, while at the same time his tax dollar will be used to keep logging companies more competitive/profitable, so that even more forest can be unsustainably logged?

Did anybody point out that a tropical hard wood window frame in Germany today costs the same as a local, inferior quality, soft wood frame? That the green conscience of the buyer is neutralized by a price which in other economic sectors would be classified as dumping? Is this the type of competitivness to be maintained?

Is this really the formula based on which: "We need to extend pilot 'success' to additional logging concessions and companies?"

Just a few more questions, on the roles of the various players as presented in your opinion piece:

I am glad you clarified some of the roles which up to know had never been spelt out.

The conservation NGO's will establish the criteria for sound wildlife management and certification. They will pay for it. Fine no problem at all.

So with the legislative side covered we come to the executive role. You state: Government employees trained by conservation NGOs and financed by multiple sources will do most of the law enforcement. Did anybody ask how many cases of effective law enforcement exist in the Central African Bush Meat context where government employees make the decisions - and the magistrates behind them actually back them up??

I agree that barriers manned by these "Eco guards" could have an impact on prices of bush meat, mainly because traders and hunters will have to pay more "incentives". Higher prices could have an impact on consumer demand. (although we seem to not even have the basics for discussing price elasticity and its impact on consumer demand, with your findings that bush meat is cheaper in urban centers like Yaounde and with my anecdotal data and most of the scientific one pointing in the opposite direction).

Loggers will enforce a code of conduct for its employees: Did anybody ask what percentage of a logging towns population might be covered by such policies and procedures. In case of Pokola, the CIB headquarters, the employees amount to 1000, the family members to 10,000, and the hangers on to 5000. And according to D. Shear's study each one of the employees earns the same amount in bush meat related activities as he does in salary. What chance has a logging company got to get employees to accept new rules and regulations if their salary is not doubled? What would that do to profitability and competitiveness?

Then there is the importation of protein substitutes: Will this go beyond what our investigation revealed is happening at Pokola/CIB - which officially has such a policy and which according to our investigators amounts to the import of one cow on Friday for the Moslem population which traditionally does not eat bush meat anyway.

Having a legislative aspect and an executive one, there remains the Judiciary: Who will audit these project and based on what criteria? There is no mention as to what any donor will get or is getting in terms of evidence that these are not just exercises in window dressing? You state barriers CAN halt transportation of bushmeat. Was the question asked HAVE THEY and how was that audited and monitored? Will the auditing process involve investigative methods like with all other contraband anywhere else in the world (e.g. undercover investigations)?

Let me finish with two more questions:

How many of the participants to the conference went to the bush meat section of the main Libreville market to see fresh elephant trunk and chimp and gorilla arms on open display - as we had no problem to document a few weeks ago. Did they ask themselves or the participants the question what could be expected from the lonely government guard at a bush meat barrier as long as the above mentioned scenario plays out every day under the very eyes of the conservation executives, the ministers and the police commanders?

How many took the trip out to the main Oukume Port, some 30 kms from town. A huge facility and a beehive of activity with dozens of caterpillars loading and unloading trains, lorries, ships and floats. 24 hours a day - under floodlights - 7 days a week. A real sight - of Africas primary forest trees in their final transport stage. How many were tempted to pull their check books and make a donation so the logging industry could remain competitive?

It seems I have once again lived up to my image a being constantly negative. Sorry, David, I do respect your energy, dedication and expertise. However, I would be doing no one a favor by hiding my disagreement.

As it stands I am pretty much convinced that nothing we have done so far, not the dozens of expensive meetings, not the magazine and newspaper features, not the thousands of E-mail messages, has resulted in a single commercial hunter not pulling the trigger when an easy target, in form of a chimp, gorilla or elephant walked into the gun sight. Once I see meaningful and lasting change on the ground, in the hunting camps I still visit regularly, I will be happy to join the back slapping team and be a good team player.

Karl Ammann

gorilla head and bananas Copyright © 2016 KarlAmmann.Com     All Rights Reserved
All photographs © 2016 Karl Ammann
website by the Goldray Consulting Group